Skip to content

State Government provides extensive feedback to Sunshine Coast Council

Adams+Sparkes white logo

development update

State Government provides extensive feedback to Sunshine Coast Council on proposed new Planning Scheme

We try to keep these updates short and sweet, but this one warrants a little more detail, especially for those with property and development interests on the Sunshine Coast.

Since early consultation on the proposed new planning scheme back in February/March 2022, Sunshine Coast Council finalised and submitted the draft scheme to the State Government for State Interest Check in December 2023.

The proposed scheme submitted to the State has not been released to the public, so the detail and extent of changes from the current planning scheme remain unknown.

The State government has now issued Council with an extensive Information Request in relation to the draft new scheme.

A complete copy of the State’s response to Council is available here (search “Sunshine Coast Council” on the dashboard).

Upon review of the State’s response, it is evident that substantial changes will need to be made before the State will consider endorsing the planning scheme and allowing Council to continue to the next stage – formal public consultation.

Aerial Mapping with Zones SCC

Some of the key takeaways from the State’s response back to Council include:

  • The data and information provided does not give the State appropriate or adequate information to be confident that dwelling supply targets will be achieved.
  • The draft scheme includes numerous provisions that are subjective, unclear and fail to convey exactly what is to be achieved for development to comply.
  • Planning rationales throughout the draft are regularly written in the negative, stating what is not wanted, rather than explaining why.
  • Proposes greater regulation of dual occupancies (duplexes) and secondary dwellings compared to the current planning scheme.
  • Limited incentives in the draft planning scheme aimed at delivering affordable housing.
  • Includes prohibitive provisions that could impact the feasible delivery of diverse housing product.
  • Fails to promote and increase the diversity of housing options in the Low Density Residential Zone.
  • Despite proposing significant zoning changes and notable uplift of zoning around centres along the Maroochydore to Caloundra Coastal Corridor, the State are concerned with:
    • Rezoning of current medium density zones to Low-medium density zones
    • Rezoning of current High density residential zones to medium density zones
    • Insufficient uplift of residential zones in high amenity areas and in proximity to regional activity centres
    • Areas located along key transport corridors and around district centres have not been included in the Low-medium density and medium density zones
  • Council has advised the State that there is a severe shortage of medium and high-rise builders on the Sunshine Coast to meet the consolidation outcomes sought by the SEQ Regional Plan. In response, the State has indicated that the draft planning scheme plays a significant role in the determining the viability of development and influences development market conditions. The amount and location of developable land and the amount and complexity of regulation for consistent development, impacts how the market views the feasibility of development on the Sunshine Coast.
  • The State is also concerned that the design and siting provisions for higher density residential accommodation (in supported zones), across the diversity of applicable codes, is a significant overregulation that impacts the feasibility of consistent development. As an example, a multiple dwelling use in the medium and high density residential zone which has 41 relevant provisions under the zone and land use code of the current planning scheme, has 79 relevant provisions under the same codes of the draft planning scheme. Further, new requirements have been added such as slender building design for towers that are likely to impact the potential yield and cost of construction.
  • The State have advised that for consistent land uses, the Council should not be making the new planning scheme more complex, time and financial impost, when compared to the existing planning scheme. Regulations should be efficient and regulate only to the extent necessary to address potential impacts, that are responsive and not overly restrictive.
  • The State department expects that the Council make the following changes to the proposed planning scheme, at a minimum:
    • Remove dispersal provisions for dual occupancies
    • Lower the level of assessment for dual occupancies (subject to requirements) to accepted development
    • Support small lots (down to 300m2) in the low density residential zone
    • Remove minimum lot size requirements for secondary dwellings
    • Review and amend the proposed zoning to provide greater residential density of land in proximity to high amenity areas and district, local and neighbourhood centres

There’s certainly a lot of work to be done before the proposed planning scheme is accepted by the State government, so the timing of its release for public consultation remains up in the air.

ADAMS + SPARKES will continue to keep tabs on any progress and provide future updates, however don’t hesitate to get in touch with any questions or to discuss further.

Cameron + Pete

Back To Top